{"id":7620,"date":"2019-01-07T07:42:35","date_gmt":"2019-01-07T12:42:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.drivercheck.net\/wp\/?p=7620"},"modified":"2021-11-09T12:37:02","modified_gmt":"2021-11-09T17:37:02","slug":"how-to-implement-a-culture-of-safety-in-trucking","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/10.10.0.150\/how-to-implement-a-culture-of-safety-in-trucking","title":{"rendered":"How to Implement a Culture of Safety in Trucking"},"content":{"rendered":"
The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) is in the process of overhauling the long-lambasted Compliance, Safety, Accountability (CSA) program. In its stead, FMCSA is aiming to adopt the National Academy of Sciences\u2019 item response theory (ITR). This approach relies on mathematical equations to prove the validity of safety assessments.<\/p>\n
Shifting from CSA to IRT doesn\u2019t mean FMCSA is any less committed to improving trucking safety. Trucking companies will still need to focus on the following to cultivate a safe working environment:<\/p>\n
The biggest difference between CSA and IRT is the shift from estimating a fleet\u2019s crash risk to scientifically calculating their overall safety. IRT is better equipped to identify areas of weakness because it uses hard data. For example, under CSA, any crash hurt a fleet\u2019s CSA score, which ignored the fact that not every crash is preventable. With IRT, the system can look at every factor that contributed to a roadside incident to develop a more accurate picture of a fleet\u2019s overall safety.<\/p>\n